Археологія, стародавня та середньовічна історія - Посохов С.И.
ISSN 0320-8281
Скачать (прямая ссылка):
Література
1. Nahaylo В. The Ukrainian Resurgence. — London, 1999.
2. Feldhusen A. The «Russian Factor» in Ukrainian Foreign Policy // The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs (Medford). — 1999. — Vol. 23. — № 2.
3. Marples R. Ukraine’s Relations with Russia in the Contemporary Era // The Harriman review (New York). — 1996. — Vol. 9. — № I -2.
4. Motyl A. J. Competing Discources and inter-State Conflict in postimperial Eastern Europe // Post-Soviet Political Order. Conflict and State Building. — London; New York, 1998.
5. Tuminez A. S. Russian Nationalism and the National Interest in Russian Foreign Policy // The Making of Foreign Policy in Russia and the new States of Eurasia. — Armonk, New York; London, 1995.
6. Wolchuk R. Ukraine in the Context of NATO Enlargement // The Ukrainian review (London). — 1997. — Vol. 44. — №3.
246
ІСТОРІОГРАФІЯ TA СПЕЦІАЛЬНІ ІСТОРИЧНІ ДИСЦИПЛІНИ
7. Solchanyk R. Regionalismus und Nationalismus in der Ukraine // Ukraine: Gegenwart und Gesehiehte eines neuen Staates. — Baden-Baden, 1993.
8. Bremmer J. Post-Soviet nationalities Theory: Past, Present, and Future // New States, new Politics: Building the Post-Soviet Nations. — Cambridgeete., 1997.
9. Meyer D. J. Why have Donbas Russians not ethnically mobilized like Crimean Russians have? A Institutional / Demographic Approach // State and Nation Building in East Central Europe: Contemporary Perspectives. — New York, 1996.
10. Lieven A. Ukraine and Russia. A fraternal rivalry. — London, 1999.
11. Molchanov M. A. Ukraine between Russia and NATO: Politics and Security // The Ukrainian review (London). — 1998. — Vol. 45.
12. Kuzio T. Borders, Symbolisen and Nation — State Building: Ukraine and Russia // Geopolitics and International Boundaries (London). —
1997. - Vol. 2.
13. Knysh G. The Crimean Roots of Ancient Ukrainian Statehood // The Ukrainian Quarterly (New York). — 1993. — Vol. XLIX. — № 3.
14. Kohut Z. Making the Ukrainian Armed Forces Ukrainian: The Role of National (non-Soviet) Military Traditions //The Military Traditions in Ukraine’s Army Forces. 12-13 May 1994. — Cambridge, 1995.
15. Jilge W. Staatssymbolik und nationale Identitat in der post-kommunistischen Ukraine // Ethnos-Nation (Koln). — 1998. — № 1-2.
16. Цымбурский В. JI. Геополитика как мировидение и род занятий //Политическиеисследования (Москва). — 1999. — №4.
17. Skak М. From Empire to Anarchy. Post-communist Foreign Policy and International Relations. — London, 1996.
18. Kuzio T. The Domestic Sources of Ukrainian Security Policy // The Journal of Strategic Studies (London). — 1998. — Vol. 21.
19. Osteuropa (Stuttgart). — 1997.
20. Sasse G. The Crimean Issue //TheJournal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics (Glasgow). — 1996. — Vol. 12. — № I.
21. Олыневський В. Й. Военно-економічна безпека // Наука і оборона (Кит). - 1999. - №3.
22. Kuzio Т. Russia-Crimea-Ukraine. Triangle of Conflict // Conflict Studies (London). — 1994.
23. Див.: Russia and Europe: The Emerging Security Agenda. — Oxford. —
1997. -XVIII.
24. Sezer D. B. Ukraine, Turkey, and the Black Sea Region // Ukraine in the World. Studies in the International Relations and Security Structure of a newly Independent State. — Cambridge,1998.
25. Goncharenko A. Ukrainian-Russian Relations: An Unequal Partnership. — London. — 1995.
В. В. Петровський. Проблема Криму в українсько-російських відносинах... 247
26. Kulinich N. Defence Industry Privatization and National Security Requirements: The Ukrainian Case // Privatization in NACC Countries: Defence Industry Experiences in Related Fields. Colloquium 29-30June, I July 1994. — Brussels, 1994.
27. Lieven A. The Weakness of Russian Nationalism //Survival (London). —
1997. - Vol. 41.
28. Bukkvoll T. Ukraine and European Security. — London, 1997.
Резюме
В статье анализируется современная западная историография проблемы Крыма в украинско-российских отношениях. Рассматриваются различные точки зрения, приводятся высказывания ведущих политологов, историков, государственных деятелей стран Европы и Северной Америки. Выводы, сделанные в статье, дополняют и углубляют представления
об оценке зарубежными авторами сложного узла противоречий вокруг республики Крым, который возник вследствие новой геополитической ситуации, сложившейся в Восточной Европе после 1991 г.
Summary
In the article we can see the analysis of modem western historiography on problems of Ukrainian-Russian relations dealing with Crimean question. Different points of view, statements of prominent political scientists, historians and statesmen of European and North American countries are considered in this investigation. The article contains conclusions, which expand and deepen our conception of foreign authors’ assessment of complicated knot of contradictions in Crimean republic problem, which appeared as the result of new geopolitical situation existing in Eastern Europesince 1991.
ДО 200-РІЧЧЯ
